|
Post by Raider Alumni on Jul 19, 2010 14:53:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by OG Raiderfan on Jul 21, 2010 19:20:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Rush the Court on Jul 22, 2010 21:09:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Nutt House on Jul 26, 2010 10:00:57 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Rush the Court on Jul 27, 2010 9:14:09 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Raider Alumni on Jul 27, 2010 11:21:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Raider Fanatic on Jul 27, 2010 16:23:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Rush the Court on Jul 27, 2010 18:37:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Big D on Jul 27, 2010 20:15:49 GMT -5
ESPN graded him an 84, which represents a high major prospect that has the potential to start or significantly contribute as a freshman for most top national Division I programs.Why would he decide to walk-on at YSU of all places? Also considered App state and coastal carolina. wha?? He looks like a solid player to me. What's the scoop on this guy? ESPN's ranking are pretty much useless. Take a look at how they have graded past recruits. Their ranking aren't even close at reflecting how good/bad a kid is. If you want a good barometer of how good a recruit is don't look at any of the recruiting site's rankings. Look at who else offered a scholarship to the kid. YSU has several unused scholarships next year. Makes you wonder why they are making the kid walk on unless he has some "issues" no one knows about.
|
|
|
Post by Raider Alumni on Jul 27, 2010 21:56:09 GMT -5
|
|
wh
Mail Room
Posts: 6
|
Post by wh on Jul 28, 2010 17:48:48 GMT -5
ESPN graded him an 84, which represents a high major prospect that has the potential to start or significantly contribute as a freshman for most top national Division I programs.Why would he decide to walk-on at YSU of all places? Also considered App state and coastal carolina. wha?? He looks like a solid player to me. What's the scoop on this guy? The ESPN website has a discrepancy in their grading descriptions, depending where you look. If you click on the grade on the individual player's page, you get the definition you posted. If you click on "Grading" on the Men's Basketball Recruiting home page you get the following breakdown: Scouts Inc. High School Basketball Grading System 98-100: High-major plus prospect Player demonstrates rare abilities. He should have an immediate impact at a national program with the potential for early entry into the NBA. 94-97: High-major prospect Player has the potential to significantly contribute as a freshman for most national programs. He could be a three- or four-year starter and have an opportunity for all-league honors. 90-93: High-major minus prospect Player has the potential to significantly contribute to a national program as a freshman. He could be a four-year contributor with an opportunity to start over the course of his career. 87-89: Mid-major plus prospect Player could contribute for three or four years at a high-major program or have a significant impact as a freshman at a mid-major program. 83-86: Mid-major prospect Player should be a solid contributor and two- or three-year starter at a mid-major program. 80-82: Mid-major minus prospect Player could be a three- or four-year contributor with an opportunity to eventually start at a mid-major program. 77-79: Low-major plus prospect Player could contribute at a mid-major school but should be a significant contributor as a freshman at a low-major program. 73-76: Low-major prospect Player should be a solid contributor and two- or three-year starter at a low-major program. 70-72: Low-major minus prospect Player could be a three- or four-year contributor with an opportunity to eventually start at a low-major program. 40: Pending Prospect Player evaluation is pending film. I've looked at enough grades for enough players that I'm pretty confident that the one on their home page represents their current grading system. Otherwise, half the recruits in the Horizon League could be standouts at any D-1 Major program. sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/recruiting/basketball/mens/news/story?id=2639514
|
|
|
Post by Raider Rowdies on Jul 28, 2010 19:03:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Nutt House on Jul 31, 2010 20:34:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Nutt House on Jul 31, 2010 20:35:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Rush the Court on Aug 1, 2010 14:21:37 GMT -5
|
|