|
Post by OG Raiderfan on Sept 29, 2014 14:34:18 GMT -5
C
|
|
|
Post by Retired Coach on Sept 29, 2014 14:47:04 GMT -5
Bowling Green, Miami, Western Carolina, and Evansville were all scheduled last year. The home/away games against Belmont were given to us by the HL as part of Belmont's agreement to the HL when they joined as an associate member. So in the last year, Donlon and his staff added 6 new contracts.
1. They scheduled a buy game at Ohio State. 2. They put us in a low major tournament vs CSU Fullerton, FIU, and USC Upstart. 3. They signed a home/home with low major Charleston Southern. 4. They signed a home/home with George Mason. 5. They signed a buy contracts with Urbana. 6. They signed a buy contract with Ohio Dominican.
This is complete bull crap that this is the best they could do when they have had a whole year to put together this schedule and only had to sign a half dozen new contracts.
|
|
|
Post by Raider4Life on Sept 29, 2014 14:54:16 GMT -5
I said in the season ticket thread that I was waiting to see the full schedule before I decided to renew and would not if we had two non D1 games this year. I didn't renew and I only plan on attending games I feel are worth the money this year, which are few. I am not going to reward Donlon and Grant with my hard earned money to see a half assed schedule.
|
|
|
Post by Willie on Sept 29, 2014 14:59:17 GMT -5
Bowling Green, Miami, Western Carolina, and Evansville were all scheduled last year. The home/away games against Belmont were given to us by the HL as part of Belmont's agreement to the HL when they joined as an associate member. So in the last year, Donlon and his staff added 6 new contracts. 1. They scheduled a buy game at Ohio State. 2. They put us in a low major tournament vs CSU Fullerton, FIU, and USC Upstart. 3. They signed a home/home with low major Charleston Southern. 4. They signed a home/home with George Mason. 5. They signed a buy contracts with Urbana. 6. They signed a buy contract with Ohio Dominican. This is complete bull crap that this is the best they could do when they have had a whole year to put together this schedule and only had to sign a half dozen new contracts. That's pretty sad when you look at it that way. 12 months to sign 6 contracts and that is all they could come up with.
|
|
|
Post by Cheerfan on Sept 29, 2014 15:05:08 GMT -5
C
|
|
|
Post by mudman on Sept 29, 2014 15:21:15 GMT -5
C
|
|
|
Post by Raider Rowdies on Sept 29, 2014 16:53:19 GMT -5
C
|
|
|
Post by wsu97 on Sept 29, 2014 16:54:50 GMT -5
B. This is light year's better than last year's schedule.
|
|
|
Post by Nutt House on Sept 29, 2014 16:56:51 GMT -5
C. But all still be at all of the games.
|
|
|
Post by Raider Pride on Sept 29, 2014 17:27:48 GMT -5
I went with a C. The schedule is better than last year's schedule, but that isn't saying much. +1
|
|
|
Post by Tipp City Raider on Sept 29, 2014 17:28:59 GMT -5
I have season tickets for the first time ever and looking forward to the season.
|
|
|
Post by Raider Grad on Sept 29, 2014 19:39:35 GMT -5
The schedule isn't good but I still plan on watching every game I can.
|
|
|
Post by Bomber on Sept 29, 2014 19:41:56 GMT -5
C
|
|
|
Post by wolf41 on Sept 30, 2014 10:22:22 GMT -5
I vote C because it is a bit better than last year. I still believe that the schedule is of the lowest priority to the people in charge. As I said before, the men's basketball schedule is probably the weakest of all our athletic schedules and is for our most expensive sport. Go figure.
|
|
|
Post by keithfromxenia on Sept 30, 2014 17:22:20 GMT -5
I do not grade the schedule in comparison to other schedules. That is like grading on the curve. The past two years were a solid f. This year I give them a d. When you look at the games they had to add this off-season I believe there were 7 or so. Of those osu and gm were solid adds. The other five or six did nothing to improve our schedule and two are not even real games. Sorry if that eval is too negative for some of you sensitive folks.
|
|